THE LAY FIGURE, OR LIFE DRAWING WITHOUT A MODEL
June 27, 2007 by Will Stevens
Summer is almost here and a lot of people reading this will probably want to be outside enjoying the sunshine rather than sitting indoors life drawing. However if you do want to carry on with the classes you may be interested to know that I’ll be carrying on the sessions over the Summer in Horfield (North Bristol) on an informal basis. I started doing it last year as an experiment. It’s a little having six or seven individual life drawing sessions over the summer months but instead of paying £46 pounds for ten classes, which is what I would usually charge, you pay in advance for as many or as few life drawing classes that you think you might be likely to make. So, if you don’t want to miss out on your ‘fix’ of life drawing over the Summer months but have to disappear for two weeks in August to go and visit your Aunt Mabel in Dorset this gives you another option.
The subject of drawing figures when you don’t actually have access to a life model made me think of the various lay figures that I’ve owned over the years.
A lay figure, if you didn’t know, is a jointed wooden doll used by artist’s as an aide to painting or drawing figures from imagination. The type that most people are familiar with has a very distinctive, almost lightbulb shaped head, slightly rounded but basically cylindrical limbs and very prominent ball and socket joints. I’ve owned three or four lay figures over the years but I’ve never found much use for them. The ball and socket joints don’t really tell you about how muscles work and they are often very stiff and difficult to pose. Just recently I’ve thought that that they might be useful for visualising foreshortened poses from imagination–for example if you were trying to draw a figure with it’s arm outstretched it might provide a way of judging how big the hand might need to be relative to the face–but I’ve yet to do much about it and I think they are kicking around unloved in a box upstairs somewhere.
But the lay figures of old were a different proposition altogether, some of them had faces and convincing musculature and came complete with outfits to wear. According to Vasari the first such figure was used by the painter Fra Bartolommeo and was said to be life-sized, made of wood and fully articulated. In the Stattliche museum in Berlin is a lay figure from South Germany which dates from 1520. There’s also a painting by Werner van den Valckert of a man with a lay figure in the JR Speed Art Museum in Louisville, Kentucky. The Museum of London web site has a good photo of a 64 cm high lay figure in it’s collection by the sculptor Louis Francois Roubiliac which also came with male and female clothing. I’ve also included a scan of two 19th century figures. one made of papier mache and the other with an upholstered body
In !878 Edgar Degas painted a strange portrait of the painter Henri Michel-Levy, leaning against the wall of his studio alongside one of his outdoor figure compositions. At his feet is a life-sized lay figure with a yellow hat and a red bow.
The painter Walter Sickert owned a life-sized lay figure said to have once belonged to the painter Hogarth. I saw it recently (Why did I not have my camera with me?!) in a touring exhibition of the painters work at Bath organised by the British Council. The painting by Sickert entitled the raising of Lazarus is actually based on a photograph of the same lay figure being hoisted upstairs into his studio.
These days it’s much easier to work from a photograph than a lay figure but the idea continues in 3d software packages Poser and Daz figure studio. Daz is free to download and comes with a basic male and female figure, enough really if you wanted something as a starting point for a sketch or painting although I wouldn’t want to attempt using it on a computor unless it came supplied with a pretty good graphics card.(www.daz3d.com)
I’ll close with some links. One is to the Museum of London website where you’ll find a really nice colour photograph and more information about the Roubilliac lay figure. There is also a lay figure in the Danish National Gallery and a real player file of an item on Women’s Hour from a few years ago concerning a lay figure that was discovered in Packwood House Museum in Warwickshire. It’s well-worth downloading.
http://www.kunstkammer.dk/MathematischeGB/genstande_mathematischeGB.asp?ID=148 http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/womanshour/2004_43_fri_05.shtml










These old lay figures are wonderful objects and I would love to own one ( but way beyond my price range unfortunately, Sob!) There is a nice example of a wooden lay figure in the National Trust property, Snowshill Manor in Gloucestershire. The property belonged to the Victorian Charles Paget Wade, architect, artist, eccentric and collector extraordinaire and the house is full of things from all around the world which he found in Britain. It is one of my favourite NT properties and well worth a visit.
Thanks for that interesting and helpful comment Caroline. Considering how popular lay figures were supposed to be once upon a time it’s hard to find a lot of detailed information on the subject. Perhaps they were considered to be something of a “neccessary evil”, rather like working from photographs and therefore artist’s weren’t keen to admit to using them . I get the impression from the Woman’s Hour podcast that the Packwood House figure must have been lying around for a long time without anybody having a clear idea as to what it was. It would be interesting to know how many others there are knocking around in Country Houses in similar circumstances, probably not many, but one or two I’d bet! (Apparently in 1763 there was a Simon Henekin listed in Mortimers Directory in Edward Street Soho who is listed as being “eminent for making laymen for painters”). Incidently, if anyone else would like to comment on this or anything else on these pages please feel free
about lay figures, i have a couple of full size ones and and use them often in paintings.. there are a couple of paintings of them on this page if you are interested - http://www.robbiewraith.com/paintings.html
Thanks for taking the time to leave a comment Robbie. I’m curious as to where you got the lay figures from, perhaps you could leave another comment. ( Robbie doesn’t come to the life drawing sessions. His work is so amazing I’d be suprised if he needs to. Check his website out if you have the time!)
Robbie Wraith’s web site is really worth a look. I really liked the paintings with the lay figures, especially the study featuring two of them. I see what you mean about Robbie not neeing to attend life classes, his work is superb.
Thanks.. any opportunity to draw is welcome, but I am just a bit too far to get to your classes. I work with models a lot in my studio, and try to draw something or other every day. “No day without a line,”- Whistler.. “Draw draw draw,” - Michelangelo.
I had been looking out for lay figures for years, and eventually a couple of them arrived.. you are right that they are very rare - the Italian painter Annigoni had three in his studio in Florence that I got to know when I was working with him years ago, and there is one in Buckingham Palace that I have seen (and used actually..)
I also have a couple of flayed plaster casts, ie anatomical figures in plaster that were traditionally used for studying drawing , and are very useful for drawing practice..
apart from that it is possible to take turns sitting for each other, and if all else fails, draw yourself..
but the important thing is to draw from life, not from photographs etc.. to use photographs is to misunderstand completely the essence of drawing and painting..
Thanks for that Robbie!
If you click on to the following link you’ll see the forum for the poetry workshop of the Desert Moon review. There’s a nice poem there by Christopher T George which includes a link to this very article at the end so pop along to …http://68.178.150.189/discus/messages/8407/26383.html?1192888882
Hi Will
Ha ha. I am flattered to see you reference my poem, “Lay Figure,” which was inspired by what I read here. Please feel free if you wish to copy the poem onto here because I am not sure how long that thread will remain at Desert Moon Review where you saw the poem.
All the best
Chris
Here’s the poem
The Lay Figure
1. n. a mannequin or dummy;
an artist’s jointed model of the
human body. 2. n. a subservient
or insignificant person.
I sit on your oak hope chest,
life-like, bald, a cheery
wee smile on my lips, quite
nude, flowing chestnut periwig
by me side, starched waistcoat
on t’other, buckle shoes, cocked
hat, frock coat by me feet. What’s
my role, whom will I be for you today?
I’m here, ready, whate’er you choose!
I’m your meal ticket, your toy-boy, I’m
here to be manipulated, tarted, tickled!
Aye, whom will I be? Courtier or courted?
Casanova or cuckold? A maligned malingerer?
Scarlet Pimpernel or pimp? A skivvy,
a dolt, a dunderhead, a no-thing?
Christopher T. George
(Thanks Chris, and I trust you’re keeping well.)
Dear Will Stevens,
Interesting subject: lay figures.
Three things.
1. In Dutch / Flemish they used to be called ‘Manneken’ , which literally means ‘little man’. This later was ‘frenchized’ into: mannequin, a word still used (though in a slightly different context).
2. Lay figures were also used for other purposes. The bigger ones proved useful for purposes of painting clothes. An elegant dress for example would be put on a doll rather than a real model. Painter Gerard ter Borch used lay figures in this way.
3. You can also see lay figures in paintings by Adriaen van Ostade (The painter in his studio, Dresden) and Wallerand Vaillant.
Cheers,
Erik Spaans